Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision | |||
|
potential_tropical_cyclone_nine [2017/09/03 13:08] forsythsnow [Impacts] |
potential_tropical_cyclone_nine [2017/09/03 13:11] (current) forsythsnow [Which Model Won?] |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 75: | Line 75: | ||
| End Result: | End Result: | ||
| - | * Short - Medium range : HMON and HWRF - Due to the storm forming and hitting land within three days, the Long - medium range category doesn't exist. | + | * Short - Medium range : HMON and HWRF - Due to the storm forming and hitting land within three days, the Long - medium range category doesn't exist. The ECMWF did okay with the track, but ultimately failed with the strength and timing, as well as the strength, while the HWRF and HMON did well. The HWRF did better on track, while the HMON did better on strength, but overall, they did well. The GFS was too dissipating as was the CMC. |
| - | * Strength - HMON and HWRF - | + | * Strength - HMON and HWRF - The HMON and HWRF absolutely did amazing with this storm. It predicted that Harvey would blow up into a cat 4 while other models didn't, except for the NAM 3KM, which was too strong. The European model did horrible, as did the CMC and GFS. The GFS was the closest in third place. |
